Home › Disposable › Article
AirFuze SMART 30000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT BAR 6000
AirFuze SMART 30000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
AirFuze SMART 30000 and FLUM UT BAR 6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT BAR 6000 delivers more puffs (6000 vs 30000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99).
Specifications
| Spec | AirFuze SMART 30000 | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable | — |
| Battery Capacity | 900mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Dual-Mesh Coils | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | 2.01" TFT Touch Screen | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 10mL |
| Puffs | 30000 | 6000 |
Pros & Cons
AirFuze SMART 30000 Pros
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT BAR 6000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- AirFuze SMART 30000 vs Memers Wukong V20000
- AirFuze SMART 30000 vs Monster Vape Labs x KONG 50K Squonk
- AirFuze SMART 30000 vs Airmez XBEATS 40K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs AirFuze Jet 20000
- AirFuze SMART 30000 vs Olit Hookalit Pro 60K
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/