Home › Disposable › Article
Blu Rich Tobacco vs Firerose IN7500
Edge: Firerose IN7500
Blu Rich Tobacco
Firerose IN7500
Blu Rich Tobacco and Firerose IN7500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. They look evenly matched on the key specs. Firerose IN7500 offers USB-C charging, while Blu Rich Tobacco uses a different port. Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $11.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Blu Rich Tobacco | Firerose IN7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Bottom-Airflow |
| Battery Capacity | — | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | — | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | — | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | — | LED |
| E Liquid | 1.5mL | — |
| Nicotine Strength | — | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | — | Draw-Activated |
| Pod Connection | Magnetic | — |
| Pod Material | PCTG | — |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 16mL |
| Puffs | — | 7500 |
Pros & Cons
Blu Rich Tobacco Pros
Firerose IN7500 Pros
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Firerose IN7500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Firerose IN7500 offers USB-C charging, while Blu Rich Tobacco uses a different port. |
| Price | Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $11.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Firerose IN7500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Blu Rich Tobacco vs Vuse Vibe
- Blu Rich Tobacco vs Artery CL6 50K
- Blu Rich Tobacco vs True Story 20K
- Firerose IN7500 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- Firerose IN7500 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- Firerose IN7500 vs Spaceman SP40000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/