Home › Disposable › Article
Boulder Pro 5000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
Similarity: 50%Edge: FLUM UT Bar 50K
Boulder Pro 5000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Boulder Pro 5000 and FLUM UT Bar 50K are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 400mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Boulder Pro 5000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Boulder Pro 5000 | FLUM UT Bar 50K |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Adjustable Switch |
| Battery Capacity | 400mAh | 760mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Display Screen | — | Digital Display |
| Nicotine Strength | 24mg (2.4%) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activation | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 12mL | — |
| Puffs | 5000 | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) |
Pros & Cons
Boulder Pro 5000 Pros
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT Bar 50K |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Boulder Pro 5000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar 50K edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Boulder Pro 5000 vs FreeMaX FRIOBAR DB7000
- iJoy LIO SS40000 Ice-Sweet Control vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Boulder Pro 5000 vs Sikary Cloud Zero 50K Vaporless
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Off-Stamp X-Cube Crystal 35K
- Boulder Pro 5000 vs Ploox X 15000
- Boulder Pro 5000 vs Equator EQ30000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/