Home › Disposable › Article
Czar CZ9000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
Similarity: 0%Edge: Czar CZ9000
Czar CZ9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Czar CZ9000 and FLUM UT Bar 50K are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Czar CZ9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 600mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Czar CZ9000 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Czar CZ9000 | FLUM UT Bar 50K |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | — | Adjustable Switch |
| Battery Capacity | 600mAh | 760mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
| Display Screen | — | Digital Display |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 17mL | — |
| Puffs | 9000 | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) |
Pros & Cons
Czar CZ9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Czar CZ9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Czar CZ9000 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Czar CZ9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Blu Menthol vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Czar CZ9000 vs Metaku Moonwalk 9000
- Airis NEO P8000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- OXBAR Astro Maze 50K Tobacco vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Lost Vape Lightrise TB 18K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/