Home › Disposable › Article
Equator EQ30000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT BAR 6000

Equator EQ30000

FLUM UT BAR 6000
Equator EQ30000 and FLUM UT BAR 6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT BAR 6000 delivers more puffs (6000 vs 30000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $11.99).
Specifications
Spec | Equator EQ30000 | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Fixed | — |
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | Integrated Rechargeable |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
Coil Type | Triple Mesh Coil | Mesh Coil |
Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 30mL (3 x 10mL Tanks) | 10mL |
Puffs | 30000 | 6000 |
Pros & Cons
Equator EQ30000 Pros
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $11.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT BAR 6000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs AirFuze SMART 30000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Hello Synix 30K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Off-Stamp SW9000 Kit vs Equator EQ30000
- RAZ CA6000 0% Zero Nicotine vs Equator EQ30000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Skwezed x Blankers
- Equator EQ30000 vs Pyne CLICK 40K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/