Home › Disposable › Article
Fasta Burrst V2 37K vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Fasta Burrst V2 37K
Fasta Burrst V2 37K
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Fasta Burrst V2 37K and FLUM UT BAR 6000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Fasta Burrst V2 37K delivers more puffs (37K (37,000) vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $21.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Fasta Burrst V2 37K | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | 3-Level Adjustable Airflow | — |
| Battery Capacity | 850mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Dual Mesh Coils | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | 2.7" Full-Size Digital Screen | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 18mL (Main Tank) | 7mL (Flavor Burrst Tank) | 10mL |
| Puffs | 37K (37,000) | 6000 |
Pros & Cons
Fasta Burrst V2 37K Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Fasta Burrst V2 37K |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $21.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Fasta Burrst V2 37K edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Flum Pebble X 6000 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pyne Boost Pro 20000
- Kros Nano 5000 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- Pyne Boost Pro 20000 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lucid Boost 20123
- Pyne CLICK 40K Kit vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/