Home › Disposable › Article
Fasta Burrst V2 37K vs Pyne 8500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Fasta Burrst V2 37K
Fasta Burrst V2 37K
Pyne 8500
Fasta Burrst V2 37K and Pyne 8500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Fasta Burrst V2 37K delivers more puffs (37K (37,000) vs 8500). Fasta Burrst V2 37K includes a bigger battery (850mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $21.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Fasta Burrst V2 37K | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | 3-Level Adjustable Airflow | — |
| Battery Capacity | 850mAh | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Dual Mesh Coils | Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | 2.7" Full-Size Digital Screen | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 18mL (Main Tank) | 7mL (Flavor Burrst Tank) | 15mL |
| Puffs | 37K (37,000) | 8500 |
Pros & Cons
Fasta Burrst V2 37K Pros
- Higher puff rating
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Pyne 8500 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Fasta Burrst V2 37K |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $21.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Fasta Burrst V2 37K edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Rodman Playoffs 50K vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- Pyne 8500 vs Memers Wukong V20000
- Pyne 8500 vs LUFFBAR TT9000
- Metaku Moonwalk 9000 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- VIHO Turbo 10000 vs Pyne 8500
- Artery CL6 50K vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/