Home › Disposable › Article
Firerose IN7500 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
Firerose IN7500
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
Firerose IN7500 and FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 delivers more puffs (25000 (25K) vs 7500). FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Firerose IN7500 | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Bottom-Airflow | — |
| Battery Capacity | 550mAh | 760mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | LED | LED |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw |
| Prefilled Capacity | 16mL | 15.5mL |
| Puffs | 7500 | 25000 (25K) |
Pros & Cons
Firerose IN7500 Pros
- USB-C charging
FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Snowwolf Easy Smart EA9000 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Juice King A18000 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- Kros Nano 5000 vs Firerose IN7500
- Skwezed x Blankers vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000 vs AAOK 80K
- Geek Bar Pulse X 25K vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/