Home › Disposable › Article
Firerose IN7500 vs Lucid Boost 20123
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lucid Boost 20123

Firerose IN7500

Lucid Boost 20123
Firerose IN7500 and Lucid Boost 20123 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lucid Boost 20123 delivers more puffs (20,123 vs 7500). Both support USB-C charging. Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $14.99).
Specifications
Spec | Firerose IN7500 | Lucid Boost 20123 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Bottom-Airflow | — |
Battery Capacity | 550mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
Display Screen | LED | 2.5" LED Display Screen |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 16mL | 18mL |
Puffs | 7500 | 20,123 |
Pros & Cons
Firerose IN7500 Pros
- USB-C charging
Lucid Boost 20123 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Lucid Boost 20123 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Firerose IN7500 is more affordable ($6.99 vs $14.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lucid Boost 20123 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Firerose IN7500 vs Lost Vape Lightrise TB 18K
- Nasty Bar DX8.5i 8500 vs Lucid Boost 20123
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Olit Shishalit 30K
- Horizon Binaries SV15000 vs Firerose IN7500
- VOZOL Gear 10000 vs Firerose IN7500
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Memers Switcher S22000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/