Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Kanger SUBOX 50000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Kanger SUBOX 50000

FLUM UT Bar 50K

Kanger SUBOX 50000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Kanger SUBOX 50000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Kanger SUBOX 50000 delivers more puffs (50000 (50K) vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). Kanger SUBOX 50000 includes a bigger battery (900mAh vs 760mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Kanger SUBOX 50000 is more affordable ($16.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Kanger SUBOX 50000 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | Adjustable Switch | Adjustable |
Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 900mAh |
Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | — | 0.5ohm Mesh Coil |
Display Screen | Digital Display | LED |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 0.5% (5mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | — | 40mL |
Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 50000 (50K) |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- USB-C charging
Kanger SUBOX 50000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Kanger SUBOX 50000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Kanger SUBOX 50000 is more affordable ($16.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Kanger SUBOX 50000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- PYRO Boost 25K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Rodman Playoffs 50K vs Kanger SUBOX 50000
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Lost Angel Mate 50K
- Kanger SUBOX 50000 vs AAOK Dual Flavors 110K
- VNM Ice 30K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Lost Mary x Urban Tale E-Hookah 26K vs Kanger SUBOX 50000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/