Home › Disposable › Article

FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Kanger Subox Mate 50K D-

Similarity: 0%Edge: Kanger Subox Mate 50K D-
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Kanger Subox Mate 50K D-

FLUM UT Bar 50K and Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- delivers more puffs (50,000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 600mAh). FLUM UT Bar 50K offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- uses Proprietary Charging (Battery). Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- is more affordable ($10.99 vs $19.99).

Specifications

SpecFLUM UT Bar 50KKanger Subox Mate 50K D-
AirflowAdjustable SwitchAdjustable
Battery Capacity760mAh600mAh
Charging PortUSB Type-CProprietary Charging (Battery)
Display ScreenDigital Display
Nicotine Strength5% (50mg)0.35% (3.5mg)
OperationDraw-ActivatedDraw-Activated
Prefilled Capacity40mL
Puffs50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)50,000

Pros & Cons

FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros

  • Bigger battery
  • USB-C charging

Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- Pros

  • Higher puff rating

Headline comparison chart

Highlights

Best pickKanger Subox Mate 50K D-
ChargingFLUM UT Bar 50K offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- uses Proprietary Charging (Battery).
PriceKanger Subox Mate 50K D- is more affordable ($10.99 vs $19.99).

Which should you buy?

Looking at overall performance and value, Kanger Subox Mate 50K D- edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.

Related comparisons

All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/