Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Kros Nano 5000
Edge: Kros Nano 5000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Kros Nano 5000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Kros Nano 5000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. They look evenly matched on the key specs. FLUM UT Bar 50K offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Kros Nano 5000 uses a different port. Kros Nano 5000 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Kros Nano 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | — |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | — |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | — |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | — |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | — |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- USB-C charging
Kros Nano 5000 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Kros Nano 5000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | FLUM UT Bar 50K offers USB-C charging for faster top-ups, while Kros Nano 5000 uses a different port. |
| Price | Kros Nano 5000 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Kros Nano 5000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Kros Nano 5000 vs Memers Wukong V40000 Ice & Nic Adjustable
- Kros Nano 5000 vs FLUM UT Bar Pro 25000
- SPACEMAN PRISM 20K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Kros Nano 5000 vs Off-Stamp Sweet Cube 25K
- Kros Nano 5000 vs OXBAR x Juice NIC SWITCH 35K Clear
- VOZOL RAVE 50000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/