Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Kros Wireless 9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Kros Wireless 9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Kros Wireless 9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Kros Wireless 9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Kros Wireless 9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Kros Wireless 9000 is more affordable ($13.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Kros Wireless 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C & Qi Wireless |
| Coil Type | — | Corex Eco Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 17mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Kros Wireless 9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Kros Wireless 9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Kros Wireless 9000 is more affordable ($13.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Kros Wireless 9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- VOZOL RAVE 50000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs NEXA PIX 35K
- Salt Onyx Cloud 25000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs Lost Mary MO20000 Pro
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs Al Fakher Crown Bar Cloud Force MAX 50K
- Flum Pebble 6000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/