Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs LUFFBAR TT9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: LUFFBAR TT9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K
LUFFBAR TT9000
FLUM UT Bar 50K and LUFFBAR TT9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. LUFFBAR TT9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. LUFFBAR TT9000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | LUFFBAR TT9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | — | Dual Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 18mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
LUFFBAR TT9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | LUFFBAR TT9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | LUFFBAR TT9000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, LUFFBAR TT9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- LUFFBAR TT9000 vs Olit Hookalit S 35K
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Pyne CLICK 40K
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Kanger SUBOX Mate D- 50K Kit
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs DOJO iMate X 40K Kit
- FLUM UT Bar 50K vs OLIT Hookalit 40K
- SOFI X9000 Smart vs LUFFBAR TT9000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/