Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT Bar 50K
FLUM UT Bar 50K
OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
FLUM UT Bar 50K and OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT Bar 50K delivers more puffs (50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) vs 35000). OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K includes a bigger battery (900mAh vs 760mAh). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT Bar 50K is more affordable ($19.99 vs $21.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | Adjustable |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 900mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | — | Dual Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | Mega Display Screen |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | Low | Regular | Strong |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 35000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | FLUM UT Bar 50K |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT Bar 50K is more affordable ($19.99 vs $21.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT Bar 50K edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- JUUL Menthol vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
- Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
- OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K vs ARRO Ultra 15K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Nasty Bar DX8.5i 8500 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- RAZ TN9000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Fasta Burrst 35K vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/