Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Pocket 7500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pocket 7500
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Pocket 7500
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Pocket 7500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pocket 7500 delivers more puffs (7500 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). Both support USB-C charging. Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Pocket 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | — | Mesh Coil |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 14mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 7500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- USB-C charging
Pocket 7500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Pocket 7500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pocket 7500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Czar CZ9000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Pocket 7500 vs North Vision 15000
- Pocket 7500 vs RELX Crystal 15K
- North Handshake 15000 C- vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- UWELL VISCORE C30000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- PICA BAR Super Pro 30K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/