Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT Bar 50K vs Pyne 8500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pyne 8500
FLUM UT Bar 50K
Pyne 8500
FLUM UT Bar 50K and Pyne 8500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pyne 8500 delivers more puffs (8500 vs 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode)). FLUM UT Bar 50K includes a bigger battery (760mAh vs 550mAh). Both support USB-C charging. Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT Bar 50K | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Airflow | Adjustable Switch | — |
| Battery Capacity | 760mAh | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | — | Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | Digital Display | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | — | 15mL |
| Puffs | 50000 (Eco Mode) | 25000 (Turbo Mode) | 8500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT Bar 50K Pros
- Bigger battery
- USB-C charging
Pyne 8500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $19.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pyne 8500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- BARZ 7000 vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- SMOK Novo Bar AL6000 vs Pyne 8500
- Pyne 8500 vs ELF Cigar 3000
- Olit Shishalit 30K vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
- Airis NEO P8000 vs Pyne 8500
- LuffBar Flare 40K Tobacco vs FLUM UT Bar 50K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/