Home › Disposable › Article

FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Kanger SUBOX 50000

Similarity: 0%Edge: Kanger SUBOX 50000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Kanger SUBOX 50000

FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Kanger SUBOX 50000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Kanger SUBOX 50000 delivers more puffs (50000 (50K) vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $16.99).

Specifications

SpecFLUM UT BAR 6000Kanger SUBOX 50000
AirflowAdjustable
Battery CapacityIntegrated Rechargeable900mAh
Charging PortType-C PortUSB Type-C
Coil TypeMesh Coil0.5ohm Mesh Coil
Display ScreenLED
Nicotine Strength5% (50mg)0.5% (5mg)
OperationDraw-ActivatedDraw-Activated
Prefilled Capacity10mL40mL
Puffs600050000 (50K)

Pros & Cons

FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros

    Kanger SUBOX 50000 Pros

    • Higher puff rating
    • USB-C charging

    Headline comparison chart

    Highlights

    Best pickKanger SUBOX 50000
    ChargingBoth support USB-C charging.
    PriceFLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $16.99).

    Which should you buy?

    Looking at overall performance and value, Kanger SUBOX 50000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.

    Related comparisons

    All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/