Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Kros Wireless 9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Kros Wireless 9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Kros Wireless 9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Kros Wireless 9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Kros Wireless 9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $13.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Kros Wireless 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C & Qi Wireless |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Corex Eco Mesh Coil |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 17mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Kros Wireless 9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Kros Wireless 9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $13.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Kros Wireless 9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- RAZ CA6000 6000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs North FT12000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs Elux CYBEROVER 18000
- Kros Wireless 9000 vs OXBAR Ice-Nic Control 35K
- Vuse Vibe vs Kros Wireless 9000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/