Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo
Similarity: 0%Edge: FLUM UT BAR 6000

FLUM UT BAR 6000

Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo are two disposable options competing head-to-head. FLUM UT BAR 6000 delivers more puffs (6000 vs 15000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo |
---|---|---|
Airflow | — | Fixed |
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 600mAh |
Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
Display Screen | — | Digital Display |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 16mL |
Puffs | 6000 | 15000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo Pros
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | FLUM UT BAR 6000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, FLUM UT BAR 6000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs HQD Cuvie X 25000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Olit Hookalit Mega 150K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs SOFI SURGE 25000
- Flum Pebble 6000 vs Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo
- Lost Mary MT15000 Turbo vs Luff Bar FLARE 40K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs MFU Shisha X1 40K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/