Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lost Mary Quasar OS25000

FLUM UT BAR 6000

Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 delivers more puffs ([25K] - 25000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $17.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 |
---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | TBD |
Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Triple Mesh Coil |
Display Screen | — | LED |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | TBD |
Puffs | 6000 | [25K] - 25000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $17.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- SMOK NOVO Bar AL9000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 vs Salt Onyx Cloud 25000
- FLUM Mello 20000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
- Lost Mary Quasar OS25000 vs Adjust MyFlavor 40000
- iJoy Captain 10000 Clear vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Kangvape Sommar Bar 70K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/