Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pica Bar Lucid 35K
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pica Bar Lucid 35K

FLUM UT BAR 6000

Pica Bar Lucid 35K
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Pica Bar Lucid 35K are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pica Bar Lucid 35K delivers more puffs (35K (35,000) vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99).
Specifications
Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Pica Bar Lucid 35K |
---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | Dual-Battery Design (1400mAh Main | 250mAh Pod) |
Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
Display Screen | — | Digital Display |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 19mL |
Puffs | 6000 | 35K (35,000) |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Pica Bar Lucid 35K Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | Pica Bar Lucid 35K |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pica Bar Lucid 35K edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- North Handshake 15000 Starter Kit vs Pica Bar Lucid 35K
- 7 Daze EGGE 3000 vs Pica Bar Lucid 35K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Ploox Molasses 75K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs North STELLAR 40000
- Airis NEO P8000 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
- Fifty Bar 6500 vs FLUM UT BAR 6000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/