Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pocket 7500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pocket 7500
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Pocket 7500
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Pocket 7500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pocket 7500 delivers more puffs (7500 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging.
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Pocket 7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | Integrated Rechargeable |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coil |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 14mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 7500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Pocket 7500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Pocket 7500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | — |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pocket 7500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs iJoy SD40000
- Pocket 7500 vs DOJO Sphere X 40K
- Pocket 7500 vs Spaceman SP40K 0% Zero Nicotine
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Tyson 2.0 Iron Mike 15000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs RAZ RYL Classic 35K
- Pocket 7500 vs Snowwolf Smart HD 15K Limited
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/