Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Pyne 8500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Pyne 8500
FLUM UT BAR 6000
Pyne 8500
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and Pyne 8500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Pyne 8500 delivers more puffs (8500 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Mesh Coils |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 15mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 8500 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
Pyne 8500 Pros
- Higher puff rating
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $12.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Pyne 8500 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Snowplus DASH 4000
- Pyne 8500 vs ELF VPR 12000
- Pyne 8500 vs OXBAR x Juice Magic Maze 2.0 30K 0% Zero Nicotine
- Pyne 8500 vs Memers XSORB C30000
- Pyne 8500 vs JNR Shisha Hookah Box 30K
- Pyne 8500 vs RAZ TN9000 0% Zero Nicotine
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/