Home › Disposable › Article
FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs RAZ TN9000
Similarity: 0%Edge: RAZ TN9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000
RAZ TN9000
FLUM UT BAR 6000 and RAZ TN9000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. RAZ TN9000 delivers more puffs (9000 vs 6000). Both support USB-C charging. FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $16.99).
Specifications
| Spec | FLUM UT BAR 6000 | RAZ TN9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 650mAh |
| Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
| Coil Type | Mesh Coil | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activation |
| Prefilled Capacity | 10mL | 12mL |
| Puffs | 6000 | 9000 |
Pros & Cons
FLUM UT BAR 6000 Pros
RAZ TN9000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | RAZ TN9000 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | FLUM UT BAR 6000 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $16.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, RAZ TN9000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- RAZ TN9000 vs Fifty Bar V2 20K
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs Ploox X 15000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs AirFuze SMART 30000
- FLUM UT BAR 6000 vs VOZOL Vista 16000
- RAZ TN9000 vs Digiflavor SKY 25K
- RAZ TN9000 vs Tyson 2.0 Legend 30K
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/