Home › Disposable › Article
Lucid Boost 20123 vs Pyne 8500
Similarity: 0%Edge: Lucid Boost 20123
Lucid Boost 20123
Pyne 8500
Lucid Boost 20123 and Pyne 8500 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. Lucid Boost 20123 delivers more puffs (20,123 vs 8500). Both support USB-C charging. Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $14.99).
Specifications
| Spec | Lucid Boost 20123 | Pyne 8500 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 550mAh |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | Type-C Port |
| Coil Type | Dual-Mesh Coils | Mesh Coils |
| Display Screen | 2.5" LED Display Screen | — |
| Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
| Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
| Prefilled Capacity | 18mL | 15mL |
| Puffs | 20,123 | 8500 |
Pros & Cons
Lucid Boost 20123 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Pyne 8500 Pros
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
| Best pick | Lucid Boost 20123 |
|---|---|
| Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
| Price | Pyne 8500 is more affordable ($12.99 vs $14.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, Lucid Boost 20123 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- Pyne 8500 vs Pyne CLICK 40K Kit
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Luff Bar FLARE 40K
- Pyne 8500 vs SOFI X9000 0% Zero Nicotine Smart
- Pyne 8500 vs Fasta Burrst V2 37K
- Pyne 8500 vs Memers XSORB C30000
- Lucid Boost 20123 vs Uwell Caliburn Bar S18000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/