Home › Disposable › Article
Pocket 7500 vs SWFT Meta 30000
Similarity: 0%Edge: SWFT Meta 30000

Pocket 7500

SWFT Meta 30000
Pocket 7500 and SWFT Meta 30000 are two disposable options competing head-to-head. SWFT Meta 30000 delivers more puffs (30,000 vs 7500). Both support USB-C charging. Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99).
Specifications
Spec | Pocket 7500 | SWFT Meta 30000 |
---|---|---|
Airflow | — | Adjustable |
Battery Capacity | Integrated Rechargeable | 800mAh |
Charging Port | Type-C Port | USB Type-C |
Coil Type | Mesh Coil | Dual-Mesh Coils |
Display Screen | — | Smart Digital Display |
Nicotine Strength | 5% (50mg) | 5% (50mg) |
Operation | Draw-Activated | Draw-Activated |
Prefilled Capacity | 14mL | 24mL |
Puffs | 7500 | 30,000 |
Pros & Cons
Pocket 7500 Pros
SWFT Meta 30000 Pros
- Higher puff rating
- USB-C charging
Headline comparison chart
Highlights
Best pick | SWFT Meta 30000 |
---|---|
Charging | Both support USB-C charging. |
Price | Pocket 7500 is more affordable ($9.99 vs $15.99). |
Which should you buy?
Looking at overall performance and value, SWFT Meta 30000 edges ahead based on puffs, battery, e-liquid, and pricing.
Related comparisons
- SWFT Meta 30000 vs Salt Onyx Cloud 25000
- Logic Power Starter Kit vs SWFT Meta 30000
- Metaku Moonwalk 9000 vs Pocket 7500
- Pocket 7500 vs Kanger SUBOX 50000
- NEXA N20000 vs SWFT Meta 30000
- SWFT Meta 30000 vs Lost Mary Quasar OS25000
All Images data are taken from https://www.elementvape.com/